Study finds consumers pay extra for cars just under multiples of 10,000 miles

Odometer Trap: Shoppers Pay Premium for Cars Hovering Just Below Round Mileage Marks

Sharing is caring!

Study finds consumers pay extra for cars just under multiples of 10,000 miles

Left-Digit Bias in Everyday Decisions (Image Credits: Pixabay)

When scanning listings for a used car, many buyers feel a rush of optimism at an odometer showing 49,999 miles. That reading appears far superior to 50,000, even though the vehicles differ by just one mile. Researchers at the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin uncovered this pattern in a large-scale analysis, demonstrating how such perceptions drive up prices by as much as $170 per vehicle.[1][2]

The phenomenon stems from left-digit bias, where people overweight the leading digit in numbers. This mental shortcut affects major purchases like cars, leading to systematic overvaluation of mileage readings just shy of round thresholds, such as multiples of 10,000 miles.

Left-Digit Bias in Everyday Decisions

Left-digit bias influences judgments across pricing and quantities, but it takes a particularly clear form in odometer readings. Consumers perceive a car at 49,999 miles as significantly fresher than one at 50,000 miles, despite minimal actual difference. This distortion arises because the mind anchors heavily on the “4” versus the “5,” skimming over subsequent digits.

Studies have documented this effect in various contexts, from retail prices to performance metrics. In the used car market, however, the stakes run higher, with thousands of dollars on the line. Sellers and intermediaries recognize these patterns, adjusting strategies to exploit the predictable inattention.[2]

Massive Dataset Reveals Clear Patterns

Analysts examined records from 4.8 million used car transactions in Texas between 2014 and 2021, capturing about 10% of national sales. The data included odometer readings, sale prices, and transaction types, focusing on vehicles between 25,000 and 150,000 miles. Researchers compared outcomes around 10,000-mile cutoffs, such as 19,999 versus 20,000 miles.

Prices dropped sharply just after each threshold, confirming the bias. For instance, dealership sales prices fell by $146 at 60,000 miles and $168 at 100,000 miles. Transaction volumes also declined by 1% to 5% immediately above these points, with vehicles below thresholds selling 6% faster overall.[1][2]

Statistical models estimated inattention levels, revealing that buyers undervalued mileage systematically. A typical dealership buyer treated a 69,000-mile car as roughly 64,900 miles, while private buyers perceived it closer to 67,200 miles.

Dealerships Reap Bigger Rewards

The bias proved twice as pronounced in dealership sales compared to private peer-to-peer deals. Dealership buyers showed higher inattention parameters, around 0.40, versus 0.19 to 0.28 for private transactions. This gap allowed dealers to charge more while offering sellers higher purchase prices for low-threshold cars.

Profit margins swelled below cutoffs. At 99,999 miles, dealerships earned $13 million more across vehicles than at 100,000 miles, a 36% uplift. Cars just under thresholds routed through dealers 4% more often and lingered fewer days on lots, like 1.74 fewer days near 90,000 miles.[2]

Threshold Sales Price Drop (Just Above) Dealership Profit Gain (Below)
60,000 miles $146 Up to $170
100,000 miles $168 $168 extra

Key Effects of the Bias

  • Higher sale prices for vehicles just below 10,000-mile marks, averaging 10.8% jumps.
  • Dealerships pay sellers more upfront for these cars, securing supply.
  • Faster turnover and elevated profits, especially at higher mileages like 100,000.
  • Private sales show weaker effects, highlighting intermediary advantages.

Raghunath Rao, a marketing professor at McCombs and co-author of the study published in the Journal of Marketing Research, described the dynamic starkly. “The dealerships are the ones who are collecting these taxes from people,” he said. He added that dealerships benefit from “this bias that exists purely in consumers’ minds.”[1]

The findings underscore how cognitive quirks persist even in competitive markets. Buyers, particularly at dealerships, bear the cost through inflated prices, while sellers gain from quicker deals.

For everyday shoppers, awareness offers a simple fix. Rao advised: “Next time you’re in the market for a used good, don’t just pay attention to the leftmost digit. Pay attention to all the digits and set your price expectations accordingly.”[1] This nudge could save hundreds on the next purchase, turning a mental blind spot into a smarter deal.

About the author
Lucas Hayes

Leave a Comment